<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conversation with Rob King, Editor-in-Chief of ESPN.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebusinessofsports.com/2009/08/12/conversation-with-rob-king-editor-in-chief-of-espncom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebusinessofsports.com/2009/08/12/conversation-with-rob-king-editor-in-chief-of-espncom/</link>
	<description>News and opinions on the business side of sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:59:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puck Daddy in Vegas: 21 observations about hockey, gambling, new media journalism and Blogs With Balls 2.0 &#124; Sports News Images and Videos</title>
		<link>http://www.thebusinessofsports.com/2009/08/12/conversation-with-rob-king-editor-in-chief-of-espncom/comment-page-1/#comment-12314</link>
		<dc:creator>Puck Daddy in Vegas: 21 observations about hockey, gambling, new media journalism and Blogs With Balls 2.0 &#124; Sports News Images and Videos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebusinessofsports.com/?p=1918#comment-12314</guid>
		<description>[...] folks at Blogs With Balls that didn&#8217;t come off all that well (RE: Sports Illustrated), but Rob King, editor-in-chief of ESPN.com, was not one of them. He rationally defended the network from criticisms, he was candid about its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] folks at Blogs With Balls that didn&#8217;t come off all that well (RE: Sports Illustrated), but Rob King, editor-in-chief of ESPN.com, was not one of them. He rationally defended the network from criticisms, he was candid about its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RV</title>
		<link>http://www.thebusinessofsports.com/2009/08/12/conversation-with-rob-king-editor-in-chief-of-espncom/comment-page-1/#comment-11268</link>
		<dc:creator>RV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebusinessofsports.com/?p=1918#comment-11268</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the policy is that outlandish.  There will always be appropriate language for work and keeping this in mind.  Even if it is your own personal brand you are still working for ESPN.  

Some things are just meant to be broken on the website and NOT Twitter.  They have enough entities which can help fans.  I think this was a good move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the policy is that outlandish.  There will always be appropriate language for work and keeping this in mind.  Even if it is your own personal brand you are still working for ESPN.  </p>
<p>Some things are just meant to be broken on the website and NOT Twitter.  They have enough entities which can help fans.  I think this was a good move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Favreau</title>
		<link>http://www.thebusinessofsports.com/2009/08/12/conversation-with-rob-king-editor-in-chief-of-espncom/comment-page-1/#comment-8266</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Favreau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebusinessofsports.com/?p=1918#comment-8266</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the policy is that outlandish.  There will always be appropriate language for work and keeping this in mind.  Even if it is your own personal brand you are still working for ESPN.  

Some things are just meant to be broken on the website and NOT Twitter.  They have enough entities which can help fans.  I think this was a good move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the policy is that outlandish.  There will always be appropriate language for work and keeping this in mind.  Even if it is your own personal brand you are still working for ESPN.  </p>
<p>Some things are just meant to be broken on the website and NOT Twitter.  They have enough entities which can help fans.  I think this was a good move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

